Skip to main content
It looks like you're using Internet Explorer 11 or older. This website works best with modern browsers such as the latest versions of Chrome, Firefox, Safari, and Edge. If you continue with this browser, you may see unexpected results.

Predatory Publishing

Assess Journals - Criteria and Tools

Checklists

Criteria below are adapted from CARL's How to Assess a Journal resource. 


Review articles
  • Read articles from the journal to get a sense of quality

Investigate the journal's reputation
  • Consult with colleagues; have they published in or heard of the journal?
  • Search online for any comments/posts from academics about their experiences with a journal

Tools: 

  • Retraction Watch: Database of journal retractions maintained by the nonprofit Center for Scientific Integrity

Be critical about the journal's marketing and review process 
  • Does the journal send unsolicited emails?
  • Does the journal promise a quick peer review process?

Review the journal's website 
  • Is there clear and detailed information available about:
    • the peer review process
    • APCs (article processing charges)
    • how to contact the publisher
    • the editorial board, including affiliations 
    • author rights, including copyright 
  • Does the website state where the journal is indexed, and are you familiar with the indexes?
  • What is the scope of the journal? Is it overly broad?
  • Is the website design professional looking, with no spelling or grammar errors?
  • Does the journal reference well-known metrics such as impact factor or metrics you have never heard of?
  • Is the journal a member of any reputable organizations, such as the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE)?
  • Some predatory publishers include false information on websites in order to appear legitimate, such as using academics' names without their knowledge.
    • Investigate some members of the editorial board. Do they reference their connection to the journal?
    •  Verify claims about impact factors and other metrics, indexes, and memberships

Tools:

Select Journals - Additional Resources

Complicating Factors

Identifying the most exploitative bad-faith journals is important, but does not fully address the complexity of the problem or practices that fall into grey areas. For example, a 'legitimate' journal:

Further reading:

Additional Resources

Presentation delivered by John Dupuis, York University, at OCADU's Open Access Week, 2015:

Attribution

Creative Commons License
This Guide is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY), unless otherwise noted.

chat loading...